Breaking Down Vendor Strategy In New Markets

As manufacturers get larger, they sometimes begin to look at other adjacent markets that they can get into to leverage their current market position. One example might be a SAN array manufacturer deciding to sell a disk-to-disk backup solution or developing a new feature for their existing solution, such as adding deduplication. How they decide to accomplish this task and how committed they are may directly impact the customer.

George Crump

August 10, 2010

4 Min Read
NetworkComputing logo in a gray background | NetworkComputing

As manufacturers get larger, they sometimes begin to look at other adjacent markets that they can get into to leverage their current market position. One example might be a SAN array manufacturer deciding to sell a disk-to-disk backup solution or developing a new feature for their existing solution, such as adding deduplication. How they decide to accomplish this task and how committed they are may directly impact the customer.

When trying to bring new products to market, manufacturers have four options. They can make it, they can buy it, they can OEM it or they can resell it. It is what they do with each of these processes that determines if they are truly adding value and are committed to the new direction, or if they are attempting to get a temporary revenue boost.

If the manufacturer makes the product, they are investing their own R&D into the process. The resulting product is their own, and it generally has some unique capabilities that make it worth consideration in the market. The challenge with making it is the time it takes to move from idea to actual product. If a manufacturer feels that the market will pass them by because of the time it takes to build a product on their own, or if they don't have the resources or internal expertise to develop the product, they will look at the other options.

When it comes to buying a technology, a purchase does not mean that the manufacturer will be adding value. The manufacturer is making a statement that this market is important by spending money to either get into the market or enhance their position in a market. The trick with buying a technology is integrating the new company into the manufacturer's organization. It is also interesting to see how far the manufacturer will go with the acquisition. Will they simply try to access a new market or will they take the technology and enhance their existing products, or will they do both? The further the manufacturer takes the product, typically the more value they will add, the more committed they are. This hopefully leads to higher returns on investment.

OEMing a product typically means that the manufacturer is going to make a serious commitment to a technology, probably brand it themselves and sell the technology as if it were their own. While not the same level of commitment as the first two options, it is fairly significant. As is the case with a purchase, it is what they do with the OEM relationship that demonstrates the value that the manufacturer is prepared to bring to the relationship. Many will take the product and either directly enhance it, directly enhance theirs or develop a special connection between the two products. This does take investment and commitment on the part of the manufacturer .OEM relationships are certainly easier for the manufacturer to terminate than if they had bought something or built it themselves. Depending on the manufacturer, the OEM this might leave the customer in a difficult situation when this happens. This also happens when the OEM is bought by a competitor. It may be very difficult for the manufacturer that originally supplied the product to continue to support it. The new purchaser of the OEM may want to use their influence to move customers to their other products, which can get ugly.

Reselling a product is the option that concerns me the least. Manufacturers have lists of products they can provide you that either enhance their current solution or give you more product to buy from them. Upfront, you know that the relationship is one of convenience. For example a provider of SAN storage also providing the SAN switches and HBAs. What is really strange is when a manufacturer resells a product that has really nothing to do with its current product offering, which is even more humorous is when it competes with one of their own products.

We see this reselling of a competing product problem right now in solid state storage. As we detail in "SSD in Legacy Storage Systems," some legacy storage systems struggle with integrating SSD and getting the maximum performance out of the technology. Interestingly, many of the manufacturers have one or several alternate solid state storage systems to offer in case their legacy systems don't hold up. While these resell something better, situations have made for interesting meetings with the customer. My concern is what happens when the alternative is not presented to the customer. Certainly the assumption would be that moving to a resale product would be an act of last resort, but maybe it shouldn't be.

At the end of the day, it is really up to the user to understand what value the manufacturer is bringing to any of these situations. Always look at the alternatives. In the resell and OEM cases, try to speak directly to the original supplier without the manufacturer in the room. Most importantly, know what you are going to do if one of these relationships fizzles out.

Read more about:

2010
SUBSCRIBE TO OUR NEWSLETTER
Stay informed! Sign up to get expert advice and insight delivered direct to your inbox

You May Also Like


More Insights