VoIP Needs A Users' Champion
Now that various legislative and regulatory bodies have started the process of muddying the waters over VoIP, one thing is clear: Nobody's looking out for the users, people trying to
February 13, 2004
![Network Computing logo Network Computing logo](https://eu-images.contentstack.com/v3/assets/bltde8121fc52c5c8f3/blt3f3d0318f746b1c2/65a530e4187606040a1d8b8c/placeholder.png?width=1280&auto=webp&quality=95&format=jpg&disable=upscale)
Now that various legislative and regulatory bodies have started the process of muddying the waters over VoIP, one thing is clear: Nobody's looking out for the users, people trying to use the technology to improve their businesses.
Today's FCC meeting took a first, tentative step in providing some leadership on the issue, when the commission decided that the geeky Free World Dialupservice was free to operate without having to worry about regulatory interference. While that's great news for Jeff Pulver, it doesn't mean a whole lot to enterprises looking to buy VoIP services from traditional suppliers, like AT&T.
In that battle -- which will involve numerous players from the lands of cable, telecom, wireless and government -- the armies of lobbyists and lawyers are just now being pulled from the ground, readying their eventual march upon a telecom version of Helms Deep. All we need is a King Theoden to overlook the scene and mutter a prophetic, "So it begins."
Users, unfortunately, don't have an elf or a dwarf to help them. All the talk right now is vendors versus regulators versus lawmakers, trying to decide who will divvy up the eventual spoils. In the meantime, regulatory uncertainty will cast a doubt over the viability of VoIP services (and stifle investment in VoIP concerns), keeping many potential customers on the sidelines.
How can that change? In a perfect world, a political leader would emerge, with a sensible plan that balances the need to fund important infrastructure elements (like 911 service and rural connectivity) with a light regulatory and fee touch that would encourage entrepreneurs to invest in and develop the nascent technology. Users could rally behind such a leader, offering voting and even fundraising support to bolster said leader's political strength.Unfortunately, that person doesn't exist within the Bush administration. One man who could lead such a movement, FCC chairman Michael Powell, has shown the touch of a bricklayer when it comes to crafting delicate political positions.
Today, Powell showed his willingness to keep waffling. While proclaiming Pulver's operation something that should be free of regulation, Powell and his commission -- especially those who dissented Thursday -- made it clear that more-robust VoIP services, such as those that interconnect with the current circuit-switched infrastructure, would be held to a different, and yet undetermined, set of rules.
Lurking in the woods is Ted Stevens, the powerful Republican senator from Alaska who's sharpening his legislative chainsaw for any rulings that try to eliminate fees for rural access. Meanwhile, minor-league bureaucrats in Minnesota and California are rushing into the vacuum, promising to bring to VoIP the same regulatory insight that allowed California's energy follies to flourish.
Will there be a happy ending to this story? The best guess here is: "Reply Hazy -- Try Again Later." Let's just hope we don't have to wait three years for the final part of the tale to emerge.
You May Also Like
Maximizing cloud potential: Building and operating an effective Cloud Center of Excellence (CCoE)
September 10, 2024Radical Automation of ITSM
September 19, 2024Unleash the power of the browser to secure any device in minutes
September 24, 2024